Ganja:
Hi guys. Welcome back to another episode where Mike and I go over your guys’ topics, comments and questions. Today, we have a great topic. Before we get into that, I wanted to say thank you guys so much for all the support. We really appreciate it. Make sure you guys like and subscribe, all comments, help the algorithm. And with that we can get into today’s topic, which is actually an email, and I’m going to go towards the end of it here, and it says, in this regard, I was wondering how you reconcile these aspects with the fact that every time one wins money, there is a counterpart that does actually lose it. Does this create any contrast with the ethics and integrity you preach as essential aspects of trading and for which I could not agree more? It’d be great if you could share your point of view on this. What do you got for me? Mike
Michael:
Reminds me of that Brad Pitt line from the big short.
Ganja:
Does it
Michael:
You just saying it? How’s it go again? Yeah, yeah.
Ganja:
In the movie, the Big Short, the two smaller hedge fund guys, they were talking about how excited they were. They shortened the market. They won, they made a ton of money and they were cheering and screaming, and Brad Pitt’s character was like, shut up. Like don’t cheer today because families are going to suffer and people lost a lot of money. It was funny, as I was reading it, I brought it up. I was like, this is crazy. I was literally just thinking about that the other day.
Michael:
Yeah, I mean there’s a lot of ways to look at this from depending on how a person orients to the world, there are people who are hyper political and they feel trading is evil and that there’s no real skill that’s very self-serving. Then there’s folks who run money for big pensions and endowments and nonprofits for special interests. And so you have to take the thick with the thin and figure out what everyone’s motivation is. I think there’s a difference between seeking abundance and absolute greed for sure. I kind of remember that scene. I don’t remember what they were trading in the scene though, to make that windfall.
I’ve only seen the movie maybe once, maybe twice, but I’m just reading the email here. So the things that this comes in from Stefano, thanks for the email, Stefano, the paragraph before what Ganja read says, you often mention that one needs to find what makes them tick emotionally, spiritually, and psychologically. You could put in intellectually and physically there, and he’s kind of putting them all together. And so now it might seem like he’s wrestling with the fact that in order for you to make that money is coming from someone else’s account. So just on a street smart kind of way of looking at it, I just figure people are smart generally, and they’ve put a lot of time into knowing whether or not trading is appropriate for them. They’re constantly being told by any number of people, including myself, only risk money that you can afford to lose.
And when they say that, that means to me that means don’t lose money. That would be adverse, that would, if you lost the money, it would adversely affect your life. You need to have your running money, you need to have your bills paid. You need to have a certain level of lifestyle. Then after all that’s met, if there’s extra cash that you want to take from savings and start to endow a trading account, you’re going to win some. You’re going to lose some. In my experience, no one’s really been forced at gunpoint to open up a trading account and they’re ready, willing and able to have to risk capital in order to make it. Now, the trickier part is to understand that when you put on a trade, you really don’t know who on who’s on the other side of the trade. It could be a hedger, it could be an investor, it could be a speculator, and two, you don’t really know what timeframe they’re looking at because they could be short-term day players.
They could be longer term or intermediate players or they could be longer term trend followers, position traders, investors even. So even though they might have an unrealized gain in their account, you could find someone to offset the position on for a gain, and they might still be by virtue of the fact that whatever your R is, even your three R still might not even be one 10th of there are when you think about it. So we can’t say for sure that someone is absolutely getting smashed just because you’re making money when they’re in a trade because the person that you bought the thing from or sold it short to isn’t necessarily going to be the same person that you’re offsetting the trade on. You know what I mean? Yeah, yeah, no. So there’s always newer people coming into the market. So if I bought natural gas from someone who sold it, there might be another person coming into the market that’s going to buy it from me when it comes time for me to sell, whether I’m selling it at a loss or whether I’m selling it on a gain.
So I don’t think there’s a moral argument here as it’s part of the free economy and it’s a way for people to bring financial abundance to them. What I would caution people, everybody is again, trade small. That’s small, lose small bits of capital, especially when you’re starting out because you could find yourself in a bad situation very, very quickly. But I always wish everyone the best, even the people that are trading against me and that they all have financial abundance. I take any pleasure in seeing anybody lose. When I do see the bigger blowups, I know that especially at the pro level, you’re dealing typically with ego in many ways. Folks that know better but didn’t take the trade off. And to me, that’s a breach of fiduciary responsibility, especially if you’re running other people’s money, you owe it to them to keep the losses small, but in those environments, you’re kind of encouraged to bet very big, especially if it’s other people’s money.
I don’t feel any conflict in my own body in doing this. I feel you can be spiritual and still wish everyone the best. It would probably help if we knew who the counterparties were on all the trades, but you don’t. They’re deliberately anonymous from you. So I think you can still hope for everyone else’s financial abundance on their own terms, in their own timeframe. All you can do is manage risk in the ever evolving moment of right now. So if you get hung up on the moral stuff, it’s probably not probably a good fit for you. But here in my house we’re capitalists and I’m not doing anything illegal or unlawful. I’m not cheating. It’s simple risk management. That’s really all it is. So I don’t really myself have any problems with it. What do you think?
Ganja:
I think that the only real ethical or moral argument to be made is only for people who are cheating. I think that otherwise you go into trading understanding that there is a chance that you’re not going to win, and it’s probably not small if you’re just starting out. If you don’t know what you’re doing, there’s probably more of a chance that you’re going to lose. So I think if you kind of stick to the core tenets of what you just said of don’t risk more than you’re willing to lose and obviously don’t cheat. Cheating’s not good ever, and just take your time, start small. I don’t really think there’s a moral argument to be made. I mean, if that’s the case, obviously they’re very different, and I’m not trying to draw a comparison, but then you should go around to every seven 11 and stop people from buying $3 lottery tickets.
It’s a similar concept, but obviously one is gambling and they’re quite different. But yeah, it’s like only risk what you’re willing to lose. And I think once you do that, then there’s no argument to be made. And sure, I get that somebody could be struggling or could have a form of gambling addiction, and then they also transfer that onto trading, but that’s unfortunate and that person should definitely get help. But that’s a completely different thing. You can’t treat the whole market like that. You just said it could be a big fund, it could be like a hedge fund, and it’s in their own timeframe. You don’t know what they’re losing or what their timeframe is,
Michael:
Right? Yeah. It’s important to understand too, when you’re starting out, you’re really running your money, but then when you get older and you go pro and you start running other people’s money, you’re serving a bigger purpose. You know what I’m saying? I’m impacting people who I’ll never meet for the good. Not that I’m not meeting them for the good, but handling their money. They’re going to get financial benefits. Some of these organizations are going to be able to go on for years and years and years beyond what their wildest dreams were because I was able to make them money and they go out and serve charitable cause or what have you. That makes me feel good. But again, it can be political. I think morals or ethics, I’m not doing anything that’s outside. I have impeccable compliance history.
Amateurs might say that you don’t create any value, but they obviously don’t understand how the markets work. They don’t understand how much math and science actually goes into it, and how much emotional integrity that you have to have when you manage risk because it’s really not about me. I’m trying to serve a bigger purpose here, so I don’t look at it or take it personally. It’s not like I’m getting beat. It’s like I’m standing century. I’m safeguarding people’s capital. Even in the commodity space, there’s no better person to do it than me. I’m not going to let them get taken advantage of. I’m not going to fall victim to stupid fads. I’m not going to get sucked into the memification, if you will, of certain names or certain trades. I’m a protector. I’m Michael Lee Archangel, and so who better than me? You see? And so I can see it on both sides, but as long as people have money and as long as individuals that I work with or for my job is to help them achieve their goals, that’s the primacy of my planning is to help them achieve their goals.
If other fiduciaries don’t have my sense of discipline, then it’s up to them to have to meet the standard as far as I can see it just in competition, you join a game, someone’s going to win, someone’s going to lose. You want to try to keep your losses small, especially if you don’t have a lot of money, which again is part of the paradox of trading is like you have to be in it. But if you’re thinking that you don’t deserve, if your politics are so messed up that you don’t think people have the right to earn money or to make gains, it would be impossible to take out your credit card or any cash and buy anything. Everything is going to be marked up for a profit margin, right? Salaries have to get paid. That comes from people spending money. You can’t think about being a victim every step of the way. That’s kind of how the world works. Even in government stuff, that money comes from taxes. So you trace the money, where’s the tax coming from? Well, it’s got to come from your AGI. It’s got to come from revenues. All the money’s got to come from somewhere. So there’s probably a few angles that you could look at this. I don’t have all the answers. I can only answer for myself.
I don’t know what the contrast with the ethics part would mean though, really. As compared to what though?
Ganja:
I think it was like, oh, if you do see it as a bad thing somebody losing, then how does that contrast with the ethical code that you set and that you have, if at all?
Michael:
Yeah, I mean, so my ethical code is do unto others, be a Christian about it. And so I just figure whoever’s coming to the marketplace, to me, okay, this is a really good question. It adds a different dimension and you think about it that way. I look at the market as a professional place. It’s a place where professionals meet. So if amateurs or newbies want to come in, and I was a newbie once, I don’t use that term in a condescending wake, which means to talk down to people,
Ganja:
Never judge
Michael:
Costanza stanza. It’s a professional environment, and that means the people who want to participate, there’s a certain level of stance. You go to Disneyland, you see Mickey standing there with the finger. You got to be this tall to go on the ride, and if you can’t meet Mickey’s finger can’t play. So that’s the way I actually look at the market, which is probably helps people understand why. Sometimes you might hear me speak as if I’m trying to discourage you, and in some ways I am. It’s because the level of competition is high. It’s an all-star league, if you will, and you can jump in as an amateur, but you have to understand everything that goes with it is you’re coming in used to playing a pickup game of basketball in a parking lot in your neighborhood, and you’re going against the dream team because that’s who’s out there.
So if you want to try to test your wares and go for it, I don’t, I’m never going to be a dream killer, but I’m going to be very practical and explain to you the reality of what’s out there. There are people who are just so skilled at this, who have a good feel, who have money, who have technology who’ve taken their beatings and are at the top. Forget having won Michael Jordan, you got 1200 of them on any given day coming against you, maybe more. And so if you go into that type of environment expecting to beat Michael or Kobe rest his soul in a game of horse or a game of 21, you have nothing to lose by trying, but be practical, be realistic. And so to me, if that person shows up at my house where the pros are, it’s not like it’s Augusta National where it’s members only, but you’re playing in a game against competition that has you far outmatched before you even know your ass from a hole in the ground before you even know what you’re doing. So to me, when you do that and you engage in the market anyway, your losses are on you at that point. You see? Yeah, I even know now as a 35 years of experience, I live in a paradigm of personal responsibility and if I lose money, it’s on me. There’s no one to blame.
Who are you going to blame if I’m acting intentionally?
So I think the question kind of begs, do you feel bad from the losers victims? I don’t think they’re victims at all. I think they’re people who consciously decided to open up a margin account or some type of equity trading account and they decided to have a go for it to them. Maybe they’re winging it, maybe it’s disposable income. It might not be their kids section 5 29 college savings plans. It might not be their 4 0 1 K plans. Again, when I say to people, you need to understand if this is appropriate for you, that’s kind of what I’m getting at money. It’s hard enough to get the grub steak in the first place. Is there a better thing that you can be doing? Could you buy section eight housing, for example, and earn rental income? Could you buy and sell wine? Could you do something that might put you in a higher chance of winning
Ganja:
In competition? That’s not for everybody. I think that’s one of the things I think this question is really, or the answer to the question is you really have to, it’s like what are your expectations in the market in the first place? What do you want? And I think that would kind of answer most of that. But one thing I wanted to mention is you talked about how they’re not victims, the people starting out or not victims. I’ve kind of believed that too because it’s like when I started cycling and I got put on the varsity team, I was the youngest guy on the varsity team, and it’s obviously a little different because in trading there’s more anonymity involved. But when I got on the team, I was fresh meet all the varsity guys wanted to not necessarily put me through the ringer, but they were happy they had a new playmate. They were like, oh, great, we got some more competition, someone else who can push me further. So to them it was exciting. And I remember one of the first practices we were working on, it’s kind of like a game of chicken. How close can you get to another person’s handlebars while you’re going through a corner together,
Michael:
Pull your elbow in the cheekbone and knock ’em off?
Ganja:
Well, and that happens. That happened to me in a race, but that’s what they were preparing for. That’s what I
Michael:
Would do.
Ganja:
So these guys were preparing me for that. You
Michael:
Pushed old ladies down the stairs.
Ganja:
Well, if you call an 18 year old kid, an old lady, then yeah,
Michael:
No, I’m just saying it’s the same mindset, right?
Ganja:
Right. It is. But anyway, so in this drill, my teammates started giving me a little bit more elbow one even actually pushed me to see if I’d fall over. And it’s like they were just testing me. Ultimately, they wanted the best for me, and they actually didn’t really think maliciously at all, but they were testing me. And I wasn’t a victim by any means. It was my personal choice to continue going that direction.
Michael:
It’s totally on you to be there. And so that’s why I don’t, again, I don’t know that where the angle, if it’s just a straight up comparison of what I’ve preached and try to be spiritual and loving and all abundant, I think it’s possible, again, for everybody to win, you do have to have extreme amounts of discipline. You do need to keep a good attitude, especially when you’re losing money, when you can go on tilt and do bad things and lose a lot more than you necessarily wanted to. But let’s be clear, if people come into the marketplace, and I generally think they’re warned 18 times to Sunday that you can lose money for things, even in the risk disclosure document, you list all the different ways people can lose money, then at the end you say, this document can’t possibly delineate all the ways you can lose money. So to me, at that point, even if the client gives you money and they lose, you’ve effectively tried to talk them out of giving you money in the first place. So if they go forward with that and you lose, right? Losing isn’t forever. Draw downs are part of the business. So I mean, what are we talking about? Do I feel victimized or am I going to claw my way back?
So it’s a simple question, but it’s also kind of sophisticated. I think you could answer it politically. You could answer it from a cultural standpoint. There’s certainly a spiritual aspect of it. There’s a capital way to answer the question, and I’ve touched on a few of them, but I don’t feel guilt for winning because I don’t sit around clicking my heels. I just think, this is who I am, this is what I do, this is my nature. Make money for people in the markets. And so someone’s got to do it because how else are they going to afford retirement? How else are the endowments or the foundations going to exist? Because these people, on a 5,000 year plan, these are entities that outlive the people who funded the accounts. In most instances, they were the grantors at the beginning, but then after they have to turn it over to other people, trustees and directors who have a lot of fiduciary responsibility, and I’m there to help them. So that’s my bigger purpose in this.
Ganja:
And one thing to add to that is no human should ever win 100% of the time all of the time ever. Because nobody, first of all, you can’t, it’s not physically possible. Not everyone can get first place. And also if you’re winning all the time, then you don’t appreciate it as much. There has to be some level of drawdown in anything in order to fully appreciate what you have and to not be greedy with it. Yeah.
Michael:
Yeah. I mean, I don’t think it’s practical to, I think that you’re going to win all the time. There’s a huge charitable component also to what I do in terms of who I work for, what I do for free, how much money I give away, how much volunteering that I do. So personally, I feel like I have a good balance of giving back in many ways, giving of my time, giving of my effort, giving of my money. And so I’m comfortable with that right now. It’s something that I look at all the time. I tend to be generous as a fault as it goes, but I don’t think you should wrestle with that. If Stefano is wrestling with this, I don’t think he should in as much, that people have every opportunity to not put their money in the market. And so if they lose, they’re not victims by any stretch.
They’re not a victim of circumstance. They’re not a victim of anything. They’re giving it their shot, they’re shooting their shot, and it’s really incumbent upon them to understand what they’re getting involved with. And that, especially at the beginning, I think they’re outmatched, they’re outgunned, they’re out ability. There’s a million things that are going against them. Unfortunately, there’s only one way to learn it, and that’s to be in it. So more to follow, but that’s really all I have to say about it based on my unique experience and the environment that I’m in now and what my thoughts are.
Ganja:
Yeah. No, I think that’s a good place to wrap up today too. I hope we answered the question. I think we did pretty well. With that said, make sure you guys like and subscribe. I’ll comments, help the algorithm. We really appreciate the support. Oh yeah. And I will see you guys in the next one.
Michael:
Take care. Okay, everybody, thanks for being here. Please take a minute like and subscribe to the show. You could also leave a comment. I don’t have all the answers, so it’s good to get some feedback. Also, if you would like to support the show, check out the links below. You can get the free audio book of the Inner Voice of Trading, and also information about the course that I teach with Victorio. Thanks for being here, folks. I’ll see you tomorrow.