By Jason Pearce
The Ratio Is Ready to Rumble
Gold and silver are highly-correlated. Making a bet on the direction of one of these metals is, by default, betting on the same direction in the other. As a matter of fact, silver is often referred to as “poor man’s gold” because you can buy it at a substantially cheaper price and it still exhibits the same trend as the yellow metal. If you overlaid the price charts of gold and silver and take off the price scale, you’d have a pretty tough time determining the difference between the two.
Despite the moniker, silver is a great trading candidate for the “rich guy” as well. I would even go so far as to say that silver is the choice of the “smart guy” when prices are rising. This is because silver tends to move at a faster speed than the gold. And during a bear market, shorting silver is the choice of the “really smart guy”!
The faster speed means that silver outperforms gold during a bull market. Conversely, silver drops faster than gold during a bear market. This means that the ratio between gold and silver tends to rise in bear markets as gold retains its value better and the ratio declines in bull markets as the silver outperforms.
As proof, look at what has happened during this multi-year bear market in precious metals. Gold peaked at an all-time high in 2011 and declined nearly 46% into the December 15th multi-year low. During this period, the gold/silver ratio went from just below 32:1 to 80:1. That means it took thirty-two ounces of silver to buy one ounce of gold in 2011 and it now takes about eighty ounces of silver to buy that same ounce of gold.
Gee, that sounds like a tradable spread to me. The $64,000 question is: When should you get in? That’s quickly followed with another question: At what price should you get in? Here’s an attempt to answer that.
The Ratio: Then and Now
In 2014, the gold/silver ratio hit a four and a half year high of 70:1. This caught my attention. I wrote in a blogpost in September 2014 that “The last two times that the gold/silver ratio climbed to a multi-year high of 70:1 was August of 2002 and again in September of 2008. Both times, the ratio accelerated higher. The ratio surged to 80:1 by early 2003 and it rocketed to 84:1 in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Longer-term, these accelerations were the tail end of a move that preceded a major reversal. From the 2003 high of 80:1 the ratio plunged to a multi-year low of just under 52:1 in just over ten months. From the 2008 high of 84:1 the ratio plunged to a multi-year low of just under 59:1 in eleven months.
Either we should now be at the top of the gold/silver ratio and the bottom of the multi-month decline in precious metals…or else we are at the point where there is a blow-off acceleration in the ratio while gold and silver plunge to new multi-year lows.”
As it turned out, the ratio surged to 80:1 over the next eleven months. After making a sharp break into the October 2015 low, the ratio recovered and is back up to either side of 80:1 right now.
Ratio Resistance Levels
The 80:1 ratio level is worth keeping an eye on. On the weekly nearest-futures chart, the ratio peaked at nearly 85:1 back in October 2008. This was during the depths of the financial crisis. Prior to that, the ratio peaked at just over 80:1 in May 2003, which was not too long after the end of another bear market in equities. The ratio peaked just under 86:1 in February 1995.
Can the ratio go higher from here? Sure, it can. I just told you that it hit 85:1 in 2008 and 86:1 in 1995. Heck, it even made to a record high of 101:1 in February of 1991 when silver was at the bankrupting low of three and a half dollars-per-ounce. But the probabilities are that the ratio has reached a major top or it is at least very close to one.
Is the Third Time the Charm?
The last two times the ratio got to 80:1 on the nearest-futures weekly chart, it did not stay there very long. The ratio nearly hit 80:1 (close enough!) in February of 2003 and made the final high four months later. The following spring it was down below 52:1.
The ratio reached 80:1 again in October of 2008, peaking at a thirteen and a half year high of nearly 85:1. It spent most of the fourth quarter flip-flopping either side of 80:1 before it finally decided to head south and not look back. A year after the top, the ratio was down to 59:1. A year and a half after that, the ratio was trading below 32:1 for the first time in over three decades.
Now that ratio has reached 80:1 for the third time this millennium, the smart money should wager on a reversal. Because the ratio often declines during a bull market, the implications are that the multi-year bear markets in gold and silver should be coming to an end as well. Is it any coincidence that gold rallied from near a multi-year low to a twelve-month high since the year started just six weeks ago? Or that gold closed above the weekly 100-bar Moving Average last week for the first time in about two years? Last year’s high was established after gold rallied into this same weekly 100-bar MA and rolled over. Perhaps last week’s successful breakout is a strong tip-off that the bull market has started.
Translation for Futures Traders
To capitalize on a potential decline in the gold/silver ratio, a trader can create a spread between one 100 oz. gold futures contract and a combination of one 5,000 oz. silver futures contract and three 1,000/oz. ‘mini’ silver futures contracts. This would pit 8,000 ounces of silver against 100 ounces of gold, which is a ratio of 80:1.
The June-July gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread is currently at -$2,000. This means that the value of 100 ounces of gold is at a discount of $2,000 to the value of 8,000 ounces of silver. The high for this spread was set last August at -$688. The nearest-futures spread hit +$132 at the same time, which briefly put the premium on gold. This was the first time that gold had the premium on this spread since 2008. It lasted for one whole day.
October 2008 marked the high for the nearest-futures gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread when it topped at a fifteen-year high of +$3,830 (premium gold). This occurred during the depths of the financial crisis. The gold closed at a premium several times during the fourth quarter of that year. However, the longest sustainable streak for the premium on gold was five consecutive days and silver still closed with the premium about two-thirds of the time (44 out of 64 trading days). The point is that this spread can’t seem to sustain a premium on gold. A reversal may be around the corner.
Naturally, one would want to know what sort of downside action the gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread is capable of. This would give you an idea of what sort of targets to shoot for and help traders determine potential reward-to-risk ratios on trades.
After peaking with the premium on gold in 2008, the spread declined to a record -$233k (premium silver) by 2011. This broke the prior record of -$218k in 1980. However, these two events occurred during historic bull markets in precious metals. We probably shouldn’t get our hopes up on something like this occurring again in the near future.
The spread did descend to -$60k (premium silver) a few years after the 2003 top was established. This sort of downside seems a bit more realistic.
Finally, the most anemic analog for the gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread may be the drop to approximately -$28k (premium silver) a year and a half after the gold peaked with a premium in 1996.
Targets as Per the Ratio
We can also use the gold/silver ratio as a potential guide for where the gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread could be headed when it finally turns over. The past is not a guarantee of the future, of course, but it can show you where the path of least resistance is located.
-Following the peak at 86:1 in 1995, the ratio experienced a three-year bear market that took it to approximately 41:1.
-Following the eight-year high of 80:1 in 2003, the ratio experienced a three and a half year bear market that took it to just under 46:1.
-Following the thirteen and a half year high of nearly 85:1 in 2008, the ratio experienced a two and a half year bear market that took it to a multi-decade low of less than 32:1.
So, guessing that the gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread will top out either side of ‘even money’…and that the ratio could head below 50:1…and that a drop in the ratio will be accompanied by a rise in the price of precious metals…the conclusion is that the gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread could be heading on down to -$81k (premium silver) over the next few years.
That’s right, I came up with -$81k (premium silver) as a target for the spread if the ratio hit 50:1. With gold trading around $1,238/oz. right now, silver would have to hit $24.76 to get the ratio to 50:1. Since silver is currently around $14.66 it would have to rise $10.10/oz., which is an increase of nearly $81,000 on 8,000 oz. This might even be a conservative estimate, too. There are for two reasons for this.
First, we’re talking about a ratio of 50:1. That’s still higher than where it eventually landed during the previous three bear markets (bull markets in precious metals).
Second, I was calculating as if silver moved up while gold prices were flat. The ratio tends to drop when metals are rising, so it’s most likely going to happen while gold is on the upswing. Therefore, silver prices will have to go even higher to get the ratio down to 50:1. If gold rose to $1,500/oz. and the ratio was at 50:1, silver would have to hit $30/oz. This would put the difference between 100/oz. gold and 8,000/oz. silver at -$90k (premium silver). Now that would be something worth trading!
Right now, the June-July gold (100 oz.)/silver (x8,000/oz.) spread is just a stone’s throw from the mid-August spike high of -$688. This is obviously price resistance. A peak either side of last summer’s high could establish a double top. A sharp breakout above it, followed by an immediate reversal lower, would trigger a Wash & Rinse sell signal. This failed breakout pattern could be even more bearish than a double top.
Furthermore, the spread has closed above the rising 50-day Moving Average every single day for more than three consecutive months. This is bullish. However, a two-day close below the rising 50-day MA (currently around -$4,417) for the first time since early November would be a bearish event that traders could use as an indication that the run is over.
History always repeats…sometimes
Brian Fantana once said, “sixty percent of the time, it works every time.” I like to think that the method of using history and technical analysis for trade selection and market timing is a little bit better than that. Still, even if we could be right on 99% of all our trades, that one percent could kill our trading careers if it’s not managed well.
We know that the gold/silver ratio has been unsustainable above 80:1 the last couple of times it made it to such nosebleed levels. This tells us which way to bet.
But markets occasionally rewrite history. Therefore, it is important to have some sort of preset criteria that tells you to abandon ship when that the improbable is happening and that your bet is losing. You can always get back in later. Risk management is what allows you to always comeback and fight another day, no matter how bloodied you got in today’s scuffle. Therefore, don’t even think about getting short until you’ve figured out where you’ll bail out if you’re wrong.
Latest posts by Jason Pearce (see all)
- How To Exit Trades Part II - September 7, 2017
- How To Exit Trades Part I - August 31, 2017
- Building Pyramids for Asymmetric Trading Gains Part 2 - August 7, 2017