Two things you don’t know about marijuana

USMC Vet Matt Dula shares his firsthand knowledge

matt dula medical marijuana

Matt Dula is a former Marine. In 2014, he received an honorable discharge from the USMC after a 5-year commitment as an infantry mortarman. When he returned home, Dula was taking 5 different prescription medications as a result of a tour in Afghanistan and an MEU in the Middle East. Not anymore.

Dula is currently the CEO of CVRN – the Cannabis Virtual Reality Network.

He replaced all 5 of those prescription drugs through the use of MMJ. Dula feels the US can save billions of dollars a year if we allowed Veterans to use MMJ in lieu of prescribed medications. 

To better understand the marijuana space, Dula advises that you focus on two things to start:

1) If you follow the money, you can see why it’s slow going in getting marijuana off the Federal prohibited substance list. There are companies that have a vested interest in keeping it illegal for many years to come, or at least slow it down so they can play catch up and set themselves up to cash in by making private investments through private holding companies so they have the equity ownership in place once marijuana is taken off the list. 

An example of this is Hawthorne Gardening Co, a subsidiary company of Scott’s Miracle Gro (NYSE: SMG). Scott’s has in fact shed its international businesses to focus on the MMJ space. 

2) Marijuana contains over 400 medically beneficial phytochemicals, the most beneficial class known as phytocannabinoids. These mimic our own body’s endocannabinoids that our bodies produce naturally. We produce over 80 but that list is growing with more research. 

When we introduce phytocannabinoids into our bodies, they seek out “holes” to fill where our bodies might be lacking in the endocannabinoid space.

“Of the phytocannabinoids currently being studied the one that’s best known and most researched is Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). THC is a compound that carries sometimes less desirable psychoactive properties. However, there are more than 100 other cannabinoids that are less known like Cannabidiol (CBD), Cannabinol (CBN), and Cannabichromene (CBC). CBD, CBN, and CBC have all shown promise maintaining the mind and body while promoting everyday health and wellness without these aforementioned psychotropic effects.”

You can read more about these here, and here.

List of publicly trader marijuana stocks




Why you need a trading plan before tragedy strikes

Peter Borish teaches and allocates funds to traders

peter borish tudor quad capital

A small asset base is a strategy. A larger one is a business. How you handle yourself in market corrections instructs allocators how you will handle yourself with their money. It’s a tryout or an audition.

Pairs trading is a good way to have a hedge that you can actually make money on. Simultaneously long one name and short another. Both “legs” can profit, whereas if you have a married put with a long stock, you’re bullish on the stock but if you make on the hedge, it’s because you’re losing on the stock. 


Have a game plan ahead of time. The market is always right – don’t deflect blame. Really good traders understand themselves very well. They have ownership of their drawdowns.

Study with Peter Borish

Study with Peter Borish – Learn Global Macro trading from a 40-year veteran

Great Trading Articles

Peter Borish on Getting an Allocation

Peter Borish on trading the S&P and crypto currencies

Borish: How to maintain your discipline while losing


subscribe on itunes

What the CL and NG contracts actually mean

Brynne Kelly gives a master class on energy commodities

brynne kelly crude oil natural gas

Brynne Kelly Energy Market Analysis & Research

Get Brynne Kelly’s free 17 page report on how she analyzes the markets.

Great Trading Articles

How to incorporate crude oil research into your trading

Why you should study term structure in commodities

The Best Trader resources on Twitter and StockTwits


subscribe on itunes

How to maintain your discipline while losing

Peter Borish on trading like a professional

peter borish tudor quad capital

Show Notes

You have to always manage risk with the odds in your favor.

Even if you lose, if you’re sticking to your rules, it could be a good trade that just had a bad outcome.

Keep putting on trades with high expected values and over hundreds of trades you’ll come out ahead. 

How you recover from a drawdown is more important that the duration or magnitude of the drawdown.

Everyone has drawdowns. Therefore, focus on your rules and play superior defense and allocations such as Peter will respect your process.



So, I want to talk about losing money and the positive impact of losing money. A lot of the folks who are listening to this show, they’re cutting their teeth. They have a trading grubstake and they come from a mindset where “if I put a trade out and and I make money, therefore it was a good decision. If I put a trade out and I lose money, it’s a bad decision.” Can you shed some light on the decision making process and how it’s possible for someone to make a good decision and lose money?


That’s a good point and I think that the biggest mistake that most people tend to make is I guess I would call it a misunderstanding of the Kelly Criteria and for your listeners, you should sort of Google that, but essentially it’s what should be your risk per trade when I start trading. We tend to think of itself … It’s also the gambler’s fallacy where if I start and I lose, I’ll add or I’ll bet bigger because I can’t lose so many times in a row and then that’s, of course, not the case and then you continue to lose and you run out of money and the next trade, it’s particularly smaller. It’s your winner.

Sometimes winning is losing because it forces you to lose your discipline. Trading is not about winning or losing. It’s about probabilities. Every time I initiate something, the risk-reward has to be defined, but I define a good trade as if I have the same set of inputs, the same variables, would I make the same decision regardless of the prior outcome? If the answer to that is ‘yes,’ even if it was a loss, it was a good trade. If I’m a manager and I relate trading very much to baseball and I’ve got a lefty power hitter up and I bring my lefty specialist out of the bullpen and he gives up a hit, is that a bad decision? Would I do it again?

If you say it’s a bad decision, that’s the misplaced fallacy because the next time you’re in that situation, you are less likely to do what you should be doing because you’re adding too much weight to the most recent observation, so if you’ve had a successful trade, sometimes you trade too large and you risk too much because you’re putting too much on that last trade, saying, “I’m smart or things are going and I’m hot.” The flip side is if I’ve lost and I don’t have my initial trading size correctly, I may cut it down too small because I’m leaning on that last observation. You need to be able to trade over a period of time with a significant number of trades and therefore your initial trading size, I go back to that first point on Kelly criteria, should be far smaller than most people think.


I agree a hundred percent. I did an episode of this show a while back and it was called the positive impact of losing money because I think our losses teach us more than our winners, right? If I put on a trade and I don’t know what I’m doing and I win money, I might think I’m onto something, when in fact I don’t know my backside from a hole in the ground. When I lose money, I get to think about a few things. I get to think about the frequency of trading. I get to think about what my bet size is, because one thing that you and I know and perhaps a lot of folks listening know is that when you’re a pro trader, losses are part of the business. There’s no escaping them.

With that, I’d like to ask you about how in your mind’s eye would a professional handle this concept of draw down, both in terms of length … You know, frequency at magnitude, right? You have XYZ draw down and it lasts three, four, five months, whatever it might be. What is your professional opinion on draw downs and how traders would deal with them?


I’m gonna jump ahead. When we’re looking at traders and analyzing them, we very much look to see how they recover from a draw down. Every trader goes through draw downs. Successful traders can come back from them. You know, when you’re doing well, again, in a hot hand fallacy, oh, I’m trading well. I’ll make money. Of course, you’re running around. Your chest is puffed up. You’re feeling good about yourself. The question is when you’re in that draw down, what are you doing? Are you feeling bad for yourself? Are you doing things differently than you did when you were successful? Are you taking a look at that? Are you blaming others for your failures?

Very common problem. “Well, the government did this. This report came out. It wasn’t supposed to do this. I was distracted. I had a personal issue. I had this position on and I went to pick up my kid from school and I forgot to put in a stop and the thing ran away from me and then it was down so much I decided that I would hang on to see if it bounced and then it didn’t bounce and then I took it home overnight and it gapped down.”

Those are great. Those are fantastic excuses. I’ve created every single one. I’ve used them all in my own life except I don’t care about them. You are what your track record is. It’s all about you. It’s not about the excuses that you make, so this is why we want to see how you behave in and coming out of the draw down, both in terms of what did you do with your risk management? How did you deal with your trading size? Did your analysis in everything, as we said in the prior question, did you address the same probabilities? Were you pressing? If you get up to bat as a trader and you’re thinking about the fact that your last trade was a loss, you’re already in trouble because you’re going to change your behavior.

What this means is if you put on that trade and you start making a little money and then it pulls back a little bit, you’re like, “I can’t have a loss in this trade. I’m gonna get out.” Well, okay, that’s an emotional reaction. I need people that are actors, not reactors, so we want to see how you’re acting in that draw down, how you come out of that draw down. That’s gonna tell us a lot about how you are gonna grow and potentially be a bigger and more profitable portfolio manager.


That’s pretty profound. Can I read between the lines, then, and think that as an entity, as an allocator, Quad might be more interested, generally speaking, in a manager who has a multi-strategy approach as opposed to one who’s gonna be like a longterm trend follower and they’ll live and die by whether the markets show them trends or not?


So, our input for us is a multi-strategy, multi-manager hedge fun. We try to generate performance without taking single-strategy risk. The compilation of managers themselves can have single strategy risk, but we’re trying to define alpha as those that can trade within a time frame that is differentiating, so in very short term trading, high frequency trading, we can’t compete in that space. I’m not trying to compete with the biggest Quant funds. They’re too smart. They’re too good, and as you just said in long run trading, I’ve yet to find an existing investor recently that wants to pay me two percent to be long Google because anyone can get long Google now, so we define things as one week to three months in earning cycle, and that means that if you are trading there and what your strategy is, it’s difficult if you’re just trading a single market, so if you’re trading S&P futures to distinguish yourself is very tricky because look how many people around the world are trading S&P futures, and of course you have the market as a whole and its beta.

But if you’re trading that in bonds and crude oil or other futures contracts or your trading sector ETFs or you’re doing things that are unique, that’s something we’ll be looking for. We’re also not interested, and I don’t recommend people do this and say, “Well, I’m really a long trader but I want to get rid of some beta by taking a ETF or something and shorting that.” If you’re doing that, to me, you’re not a long / short trader. You’re more of risk adverse. You believe what you’re doing if you like your longs and you’re concerned about volatility, trade them smaller or trade them more actively and if you’re long short, then get something that you think is going down. That’s a lot different than a hedge.


If you bail on your rules, like amateurs do, you relegate yourself back to amateurville. How you behave around drawdowns will show allocators how you will behave when you lose their money. 

Peter Borish Online Trading Course

Study with Peter Borish – Learn Global Macro trading from a 40-year veteran


subscribe on itunes