Everyone is a Trend Follower

Get some religion. Become a Trend Follower.

Get some religion. Become a Trend Follower.

Whether someone is a fundamental trader/manager or not is irrelevant. Trends need to occur in order for a manager to make money. Their orientation might be from a value or a growth standpoint, but that hardly matters. The terms “value” or “growth” as adjectives are like saying I’ve got brown hair and hazel eyes. They help you group things like people and stocks.

Trend Following as an ethos is in our blood. It plays are major role psychologically in how we determine many of our choices – our tastes and preferences. Didn’t you want to have the cool jeans in high school? Didn’t you do everything you could to not have “skippy sneakers” or a bowl haircut?

There seems to be some dissension in the investment world because, at it’s heart, Trend Following is so easy to employ and understand, a sixth grader can get it. You don’t need a Ph.D, MBA, CFA, or CMT to to understand it.

In my experience as a teacher, professionals who are very invested in their intelligence (self-esteem wise) tend to be the most rebellious. Trend Following, they come to learn, completely annuls their need (and ability) to understand very complicated economic issues and the emotional need to make sense of why stocks go up or down. That doesn’t feel good. I can identify with that feeling. I like to be appreciated.

If a trader/manager holds a long position long enough, their “value” or “growth” story will likely come into favor. However, it will be Trend Following that moves a security up or down, and the fundamental story will come “true” – at least that’s what the stock pickers will say. The trend will be underway – new money or new demand can affect the price in an upward manner.

A good friend of mine, when asked about why a stock went up or down, would say, “Don’t know. Don’t care. My stops are in to manage my risk.” And that was his answer. Whatever the actual fundamental was at play didn’t matter. People vote their pocketbooks on election day, and in their trades.

Admittedly, it feels good to figure things out. For that I like crossword puzzles or trying to figure out a new guitar solo that I’ve heard. It’s also entertaining and fun to talk about stocks and commodities and what going on in the world. But a Trend Follower, albeit with many strong fundamental opinions potentially, only needs a buy or sell stop order to be triggered to enter or exit a trade. It is at that point (the price) where they become bullish or bearish.

Trend Followers can miss some of the initial bursts of a move, but they tend to be emotionally reconciled with that being a possibility…as long as they can catch the meat of the move.

Click here to listen to the Trend Follower podcast, or click the icon below.

Blame Game

Time magazine is doing its blame-game pandering part by listing mug shots of the 25 People to Blame for the financial crisis. Many of these folks did make bad decisions and some broke the law, but investors who did not have a risk management or sell discipline in place to mitigate the risk in their portfolios have to take the blame for losing a lot of their own money. “Buy and Hold” is not “Buy and Forget.”

Blaming others feels good though. It puts the “fault” on someone else. But that, to me, is giving your power away. Taking responsibility is a better approach to taking control of your finances. It would be better to be out of Citi at $40 per share and be in cash, than to be long Citi at $1 and write scathing blog entries about Angelo Mozilo.

Louis Friend

Gold as a commodity has gotten a lot of press recently, most likely because it is running at very high prices. It also has enjoyed a 50% increase in the last 6 months or so, so everyone is talking about it.

I’ve seen several television commercials that talk about taking advantage of the recent up move in Gold. From what I can see, the commercials aim are to take advantage of investors who don’t know better. If you are to invest in Gold, you gotta buy Gold. For the most part, that comes in 2 forms: Gold Futures contracts and their respective Options, or streetTRACKS Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD).

I don’t believe that gold coins are the best way for you to play the gold move. I have a gold coin collection myself. Mint Double Eagles from the early 1900s to be exact. They are beautiful and they are now family heirlooms. But they are collectibles, not investments. Gold coins will appreciate the more rare and more precious they become, not by the rise or fall of gold itself. Don’t be a fool and buy Gold coins thinking that you’re in on the gold move. You’re not. Buy them as gifts for you kids. They’re nice and they look pretty.

From Silence of the Lambs

Clarice Starling: Your anagrams are showing, doctor. (She circles the cage, still keeping him in view) ‘Louis Friend…?’ ‘Iron Sulfide.’ Also known as fool’s gold.

Hannibal Lecter: Oh Clarice, your problem is, you need to get more fun out of life.

I Wonder…

I’ve been following all the banks and brokerage firms and how much they’ve been writing down. It seems that there are Billions more to come beyond what some have already written off.

One major bank has written off about $8 Billion and has as much as $10 Billion more. And that might not be the end, only what they can do within the guidelines of NOT becoming insolvent or putting their balance sheets out of Compliance with the Regulators.

I am a big movie fan – all types – Hollywood and Bollywood. I remember, being a huge fan of Dustin Hoffman, watching a movie he’s in called Ishtar. It also starred Warren Beatty in case you didn’t see it. The movie was so horrible, I wondered afterward, “how bad were the scenes that they cut out?” My god…

Likewise, things in the financial sector are beyond bad. And, how can you trust the guys that run them now? They are worse than Cheaters.

I wonder, how much worse could these banks be had they left their respective CFO posts VACATED for the past 2 years?

Stan O’Neal

Stanley O’Neal, the CEO of Merrill Lynch is under scrutiny for a “major breach in corporate protocol.” His Board is upset that he allegedly discussed merger talks with at least one other firm without their knowing or approval. I’m not sure he needed either, but either way, they are upset. I guess they are going to show him.

The Merrill board is delusional. There seems to be some pretty big financial dudes on the Merrill Board. It seems they are more keyed in on protocol and Sarb-Ox than Risk Management.

Merrill, like all other firms in the sub-prime space still cannot evaluate their risk exposure. On a conference call recently, O’Neal could not put a number on how high the writedown from subprime losses will be in the next Quarter. I’ve seen various reports that estimate it anywhere between $3 and 5 Billion. Dishoom.

I think a bigger concern is that the risk management models that got them in trouble in the first place are still in use. VaR models and the phrase “marking to the models” work well in normal circumstances, but what’s normal anymore? Subprime slime has redefined Tail Risk. The Merrill Board should take a look at Risk Management and the leadership there. Changing captaincy on the Titanic after it hit the iceberg would not have helped, but it might have felt good. Icy!

When Traveler’s Group bought Solomon Bros. and ruined them by canning the entire Prop Trading Group, there was a small benefit – it eliminated the uncertainty of the variance of returns derived from their operations. Sanford was no idiot. He wasn’t going to take one in the “fat-tail” by something he didn’t understand or couldn’t quantify.

The Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch would be doing shareholders a much better service by getting their hands around the subprime morass (or is it more-ass in this case?) instead of effecting a hairtrigger response that feels good emotionally, and looks prudent politically, by canning O’Neal when the real risk to their entire operation is still thriving on their books.