Search
Untitled document

Intro To Commodity Trading

commodity_trading

This course is a broad overview and discussion of the salient subject areas that one will need to navigate to fully understand the commodity space.

  • Entering Orders
  • Common Mistakes
  • Rules and regulations
  • Markets and Exchanges
Learn more

Fundamental Analysis

fundamental_analysis

Students will be introduced to what makes each of the commodity sectors tick from an international economic standpoint.

  • Grains - corn, wheat, rice
  • Metals - gold, silver, copper
  • Energies - crude oil, gas
  • Softs - coffee, sugar, cocoa
Learn more

Technical
Analysis

technical_analysis

This course sets the record straight about what is a predictive indicator and what is a lagging indicator in the commodity markets.

  • Studies in Price
  • Volume & Open Interest
  • Technical Indicators
  • Markets in Backwardation
Learn more

Trading
Psychology

trading_psyc

This course investigates why certain traders become great and why others blow up. Be prepared to journal extensively and learn about your strengths and weaknesses.

  • What You've Learned About Money
  • How Personality Shows Up in Trading
  • Ego and Self-Esteem in Trading
  • Self-Awareness
Learn more

Cramer v. Stewart: It’s about Responsibility

March 13 2009 | 7:38 am UTC

Jon Stewart is in the same business as Jim Cramer…they create TV ratings. Neither is on a higher moral ground than the other. Stewart’s genre is comedy, and Cramer’s is, at best, infotainment.

Stewart is misguided to think that Cramer is responsible for any of his viewers’ investment demise. Each investor is responsible for his or her own investments. What and when to buy or sell short is up to them, as well as when to offset a position. Putting it on Cramer is endowing him with too much importance. Ratings do not signify importance…they signify popularity. Putting it on Cramer gives away one’s power to be in control of their risk management.

Even if Cramer is winless in his stock picks, he is coming from a good place. IMHO, he is an educator deep down and he may be better suited in an Endowed Chair at a college or university. He’d be a good fundraiser no doubt.

The fact is, there just isn’t that much worth reporting when it comes to stocks – it’s trivial. Furthermore, if one is to follow CNBC’s ethos of “Buy and Hold” no one would need to watch the station day after day unless they were bored and wanted to be entertained. News that is deemed “Breaking News” today, scrolled at the bottom of the screen, loses its magnitude by the next day, nevermind years from now.

If one puts such importance on Cramer, his advice, and CNBC as a whole, it signifies the desparate level of financial literacy we’re at as a nation of investors.

Similar Posts:

Like? Please Share it!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • email link Cramer v. Stewart: Its about Responsibility
  • RSS

View Comments to “Cramer v. Stewart: It’s about Responsibility”

  1. piavarma says:

    What about Suze Orman? Should I not have followed all of her advice last week?!?

    These two posts are interesting because more than trading advice they give philosophical advice about not following the crowd or the herd. Ultimately, whatever Cramer tells you he doesn’t have to live with the consequences…you do. For some reason people seem to think they can still use the childhood expression “but he did it too!” as a get out of jail free card. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way.

    Good job with the blog, Mike. Great articles. Also, don’t worry…I’m not an out of work actress.

blog comments powered by Disqus